I think it was wrong. They could have chosen a more recent picture that showed the diversity, or they could have created a collage. Those choices would have been much more acceptable.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiExY_Madg82mXVkRfMHpm4ehUjnI8SsmS-x-ugF3EXH3SdK_aHZIWPnNGz3gv5-vEYfoItsoaWKv4fDvtVKY73bt9WGRlr3H_B7ZrrCdaO6Y6uWA_7yhp0tVXJfK9wW6gaUrZlts-bpdw/s400/bushsaddamcover.jpg)
before:1970 after:1995
i think this is ethical, because they wanted to re-publish this photo, so they made it a tiny bit brighter so that you could see the image better. I think its ethical because it didn't change what was happening in the story or make anything up, it just made it more visible. I think this was a good editing choice
No comments:
Post a Comment